"still havent found anything that GWB said that insinuates 9/11 and sadaam were linked.....IN FACT...i did find this clip from a speech just days before the war on iraq where BUSH CLEARLY STATES THESE ARE 2 DIFFERENT BATTLES IN THE SAME WAR....
"Iraq is a part of the war on terror. Iraq is a country that has got terrorist ties. It's a country with wealth. It's a country that trains terrorists, a country that could arm terrorists. And our fellow Americans must understand in this new war against terror, that we not only must chase down al Qaeda terrorists, we must deal with weapons of mass destruction, as well."
NOW clearly even landers can see he's talking about 2 different battles in the same war.. saying that because he used both terms in the same paragraph insinuates a connection is like saying because you tell someone " merry christmas and happy new year" you think they both happen on the same day! are the distortions of the left becoming more clear to you now??? good because theres more......
"In July 2001, Gerecht, then director of the Project's Middle East Initiative, criticized the Bush administration's failure to improve upon the performance of the Clinton administration in seriously addressing the problem of Al Qaeda. Gerecht lamented Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's decision to withdraw U. S. Marines from military exercises in Jordan and to move ships anchored in Bahrain because of the threat of terrorist attacks, calling Rumsfeld's decision "an extraordinary triumph" for bin Laden and Al Qaeda."
now your telling me that that the war*****r RUMSFELD actually withdrew troops from the area IN FEAR of attacks....BUT WAIT isnt he willing to sacrifice our soldiers( not his sons remember?) for cash???? wouldnt a man looking for a fight have put more people in harms way instead of removing them????? and it appears in the writer of this articles view that RUNNING FROM AL-QAEDA actually ENCOURAGED MORE TERRORISTS than fighting them ever did! landing in IRAQ only gave us a battlefield to fight these cowardly bastards.....as ive said all along.
MORE TO COME.......
"Iraq is a part of the war on terror. Iraq is a country that has got terrorist ties. It's a country with wealth. It's a country that trains terrorists, a country that could arm terrorists. And our fellow Americans must understand in this new war against terror, that we not only must chase down al Qaeda terrorists, we must deal with weapons of mass destruction, as well."
NOW clearly even landers can see he's talking about 2 different battles in the same war.. saying that because he used both terms in the same paragraph insinuates a connection is like saying because you tell someone " merry christmas and happy new year" you think they both happen on the same day! are the distortions of the left becoming more clear to you now??? good because theres more......
"In July 2001, Gerecht, then director of the Project's Middle East Initiative, criticized the Bush administration's failure to improve upon the performance of the Clinton administration in seriously addressing the problem of Al Qaeda. Gerecht lamented Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's decision to withdraw U. S. Marines from military exercises in Jordan and to move ships anchored in Bahrain because of the threat of terrorist attacks, calling Rumsfeld's decision "an extraordinary triumph" for bin Laden and Al Qaeda."
now your telling me that that the war*****r RUMSFELD actually withdrew troops from the area IN FEAR of attacks....BUT WAIT isnt he willing to sacrifice our soldiers( not his sons remember?) for cash???? wouldnt a man looking for a fight have put more people in harms way instead of removing them????? and it appears in the writer of this articles view that RUNNING FROM AL-QAEDA actually ENCOURAGED MORE TERRORISTS than fighting them ever did! landing in IRAQ only gave us a battlefield to fight these cowardly bastards.....as ive said all along.
MORE TO COME.......
